SEARCH INTEREST
Neon gets 77% of Google searches between the two.
SupabaseNeon
- Supabase
- -47% 3 mo
- Neon
- -23% 3 mo
Google Trends, 12 months, searches for “Supabase” and “Neon”.
PickDuel generated this matchup from public website evidence · Updated 22 Sept 2026
Supabase leads this battle by 13 points.
Supabase spells out the bill, Neon estimates it
COMMUNITY PICK
Community verdict is still open. The first back decides the Community Pick.
One tap, no signup. Your back moves that company up the community board; more backers make it the Community Pick. The score doesn't change.
WHICH SHOULD YOU CHOOSE?
Both are defensible: it depends on which of these you actually care about.
Choose Supabase if…
Choose Neon if…
Worked out from prices read on each company's own site and what reviewers repeatedly say, both linked below. We don't pick a winner: the right answer depends on which of these you care about.
Supabase's homepage names a customer who hit $10M ARR and its pricing page tells you Pro is $25 a month before you scroll twice. Neon leans on being part of Databricks and shows usage ranges instead of fixed numbers, which reads as flexible but also as vaguer.
Supabase's features page tags every item GA, Beta, or Public Alpha, from pg_graphql to Branching, so a visitor knows exactly what's production-ready. Neon's homepage lists primitives like Lakebase Postgres and the AI Gateway but skips any maturity signal.
Supabase's pricing page states Pro at $25/mo and Team at $599/mo with itemized overage rates, so the cost floor is obvious. Neon's Launch and Scale tiers only show a 'Typical spend' figure like $701/mo based on an assumed load, leaving the actual starting cost to guesswork.
Supabase's homepage attaches a quantified outcome to a named customer: Chatbase scaling to $10M ARR. Neon's About page leans on being acquired by Databricks and one founder quote from Encore, which signals backing more than customer results.
| Measure | Supabase | Neon |
|---|---|---|
| PickDuel score | 96/100 | 83/100 |
| Rating | 4.8 | 4.2 |
| Positioning | 25/25 | 20/25 |
| Product clarity | 20/20 | 16/20 |
| Trust | 16/20 | 16/20 |
| Conversion | 20/20 | 16/20 |
| Pricing clarity | 15/15 | 15/15 |
| Web popularity rank | #5,148 | #74,264 |
| Share of Google searches | 23% | 77% |
| Community backers | 0 | 0 |
GOOD AT
Supabase pairs every feature claim with a status tag and backs its trust section with a named, quantified customer outcome.
COSTING THEM
Its trust score still caps at 16/20 because exec and headquarters details are thin, per the analyst note.
GOOD AT
Neon's homepage speaks directly to app-generation agent platforms and backs itself with the Databricks acquisition and concrete daily database counts.
COSTING THEM
Its pricing page trades fixed numbers for 'typical spend' estimates, which makes the actual starting cost harder to pin down at a glance.
THE OVERTAKE MOVE
Neon should swap the 'Typical spend: $701/mo' framing on the pricing page for a plain starting price per tier, the way Supabase states $25/mo for Pro, so visitors can compare cost without doing math.
Fix it, then rescan in a week to see if the result flips.
Supabase scores 96/100 to Neon's 83/100 on PickDuel. Supabase's homepage names a customer who hit $10M ARR and its pricing page tells you Pro is $25 a month before you scroll twice. The score rates how clearly each public website explains the product, earns trust, shows pricing and asks for the next step. It is not a judgement of product quality.
Open-source Postgres development platform providing authentication, instant APIs, realtime subscriptions, and storage. (Based on supabase.com.)
Serverless Postgres backend platform featuring branching, autoscaling, storage, functions, and AI gateway. (Based on neon.com.)
Supabase: Pricing is fully transparent with defined tiers (Free, $25/mo Pro, $599/mo Team) and exhaustive unit costs for compute, egress, and storage. Neon: Offers an extensive breakdown covering the Free tier ($0), usage-based tiers (Launch and Scale), and per-unit compute/storage/branch rates.
Nobody has backed either side yet. Anyone can back one side, once, with no signup. Backing never changes the PickDuel score.
PickDuel reads up to three public pages per website and runs one web search. A language model rates 11 specific signals from 0 to 5, and fixed code turns them into a 0-100 score: positioning 25, product clarity 20, trust 20, conversion 20, pricing clarity 15.
PickDuel scores public website communication, not product quality. Backers never change the score. How scoring works
Almost nobody decides between two. These are the businesses the public puts next to Supabase, with the reason each one comes up — checked against their own sites and their public reviews, not our opinion.
Full-stack cloud platform for deploying applications, databases, and services with automatic scaling.
Reactive backend platform with real-time sync, functions, and database for TypeScript and AI apps.
Hardware-isolated virtual machines and persistent execution environments for applications and AI agents.
Cloud platform for building, deploying, and scaling web applications and autonomous AI agents.
Open-source backend platform providing auth, databases, storage, and functions for developers and AI agents.
Serverless Postgres backend platform featuring branching, autoscaling, storage, functions, and AI gateway.
The same rules run in both directions: Supabase is on 9 other shortlists for the same reasons. Nothing here rates anyone's product, and no business can pay to be added or removed. Something wrong? Tell us
YOUR TURN
Your score, your closest rival and the one fix that would flip it. About a minute.