SEARCH INTEREST
Make gets 98% of Google searches between the two.
Maken8n
- Make
- +10% 3 mo
- n8n
- steady
Google Trends, 12 months, searches for “Make” and “n8n”.
PickDuel generated this matchup from public website evidence · Updated 22 Sept 2026
Too close to call.
Both platforms sell the same pitch, differently targeted
COMMUNITY PICK
Community verdict is still open. The first back decides the Community Pick.
One tap, no signup. Your back moves that company up the community board; more backers make it the Community Pick. The score doesn't change.
WHICH SHOULD YOU CHOOSE?
Both are defensible: it depends on which of these you actually care about.
Choose Make if…
Choose n8n if…
Worked out from prices read on each company's own site and what reviewers repeatedly say, both linked below. We don't pick a winner: the right answer depends on which of these you care about.
Make wins on breadth and trust signals, plopping '400,000 organizations' and named clients like Teleclinic across every page. n8n wins on specificity, telling technical teams exactly what they can build, but leans harder on GitHub stars than company substance. The scores are basically a coin flip.
Make's homepage spreads across IT, marketing, sales, finance and HR with a tile for each department. n8n picks a lane on its homepage, calling out IT Ops onboarding new employees and SecOps enriching security incident tickets, aimed squarely at technical builders who want code fallback.
Make leads with '400,000+ organizations,' SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, and a Celonis parent company mention that signals stability. n8n counters with harder numbers, a Vodafone case citing £2.2 million saved and Huel saving 1,000 hours, plus 205.6k GitHub stars, but skips leadership or company background entirely.
Make lists five tiers (Free, Core, Pro, Teams, Enterprise) with a credit slider but no visible per-tier price in the scraped text. n8n does the same with Starter through Enterprise, only surfacing one hard number: a 4,000 EUR overage fee for extra execution buckets.
| Measure | Make | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| PickDuel score | 79/100 | 78/100 |
| Rating | 4.0 | 3.9 |
| Positioning | 20/25 | 22/25 |
| Product clarity | 16/20 | 16/20 |
| Trust | 16/20 | 14/20 |
| Conversion | 16/20 | 16/20 |
| Pricing clarity | 11/15 | 10/15 |
| Web popularity rank | #8,858 | #6,000 |
| Share of Google searches | 98% | 2% |
| Community backers | 0 | 0 |
GOOD AT
Casting a wide net across departments with concrete use cases like quote-to-cash and incident response, backed by a scale claim and named customers.
COSTING THEM
The pricing page makes visitors slide a credit counter without ever showing what a plan actually costs, which is a strange thing to hide on a page called Pricing.
GOOD AT
Speaking directly to technical builders with lines like 'code when you need it, UI when you don't' and real workflow examples down to WhatsApp bots and SQL generation.
COSTING THEM
Trust section leans on GitHub stars and a G2 rating instead of any sense of who runs the company or how big it is, which reads thinner next to Make's 'part of Celonis' framing.
THE OVERTAKE MOVE
n8n should put a founders or 'about us' section on its homepage, the way Make does with its 2015-founding, 350-person, Celonis-backed story: right now a visitor has stars and quotes but no idea who is behind the product.
Fix it, then rescan in a week to see if the result flips.
Make scores 79/100 to n8n's 78/100 on PickDuel. Make wins on breadth and trust signals, plopping '400,000 organizations' and named clients like Teleclinic across every page. The score rates how clearly each public website explains the product, earns trust, shows pricing and asks for the next step. It is not a judgement of product quality.
Visual no-code platform to build, manage, and scale AI workflows and app automations. (Based on make.com.)
Workflow and AI agent automation platform combining visual node building with custom code flexibility. (Based on n8n.io.)
Make: Pricing tiers (Free, Core, Pro, Teams, Enterprise) and credit sliders are listed, but specific dollar amounts per tier are omitted in the scraped text. n8n: Plans (Starter, Pro, Business, Enterprise) and execution-based billing rules are explained, but exact currency price figures per tier were omitted from the visible text snippets except for an overage fee (4,000 EUR).
Nobody has backed either side yet. Anyone can back one side, once, with no signup. Backing never changes the PickDuel score.
PickDuel reads up to three public pages per website and runs one web search. A language model rates 11 specific signals from 0 to 5, and fixed code turns them into a 0-100 score: positioning 25, product clarity 20, trust 20, conversion 20, pricing clarity 15.
PickDuel scores public website communication, not product quality. Backers never change the score. How scoring works
Almost nobody decides between two. These are the businesses the public puts next to Make, with the reason each one comes up — checked against their own sites and their public reviews, not our opinion.
Workflow and AI agent automation platform combining visual node building with custom code flexibility.
Integration infrastructure providing managed auth, MCP servers, and 10,000+ tools for AI agents.
The same rules run in both directions: Make is on 3 other shortlists for the same reasons. Nothing here rates anyone's product, and no business can pay to be added or removed. Something wrong? Tell us
YOUR TURN
Your score, your closest rival and the one fix that would flip it. About a minute.